The Simon Center on Religion and the
Constitution has formed two task forces on key issues in American
politics: the Task Force on International Religious Freedom and the
Task Force on Conscience Protection.
The Task Force on International Religious Freedom is concerned with
the promotion of religious liberty around the world, and with
placing this concern at the center of United States foreign policy.
Holding that religious freedom is a natural human right, a
pre-political liberty that no government granted and none can
abrogate, the Task Force is seeks to identify the key principles of
religious freedom, and the obstacles to its full realization around
the world. A project currently in progress is a monograph making a
comprehensive case for religious liberty, drawing on philosophy,
theology, political theory, international relations, and recent
sociological research. The Task Force will meet for a consultation
in May 2011 with invited scholars, advocates, and former public
officials to discuss the nature of religious freedom, its
contribution to justice, liberty, and political stability, and the
threat to it in various political regimes.
Scholars:
Thomas F.
Farr (Chair),
Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World
Affairs, Georgetown University
Jennifer Bryson,
Islam and Civil Society Project, The
Witherspoon Institute
William Inboden,
Legatum Institute
Jennifer Marshall,
Heritage Foundation
Margarita
Mooney,
University of North Carolina
Joseph Wood,
German Marshall Fund
The Task Force on Conscience Protection focuses on the jeopardy to
the exercise of religious conscience in American domestic politics.
Concerned with threats to the full freedom of religious conscience
emanating from public institutions and public policies, the Task
Force's attention turns to the fate of both individuals and
religious institutions such as schools, hospitals, and charitable
associations. Planning a major consultation with scholars and
advocates in June 2011, the Task Force is interested in identifying
legal and philosophical questions deserving of closer study and
analysis, including the constitutional doctrine of "expressive
association," the use of ministerial exemptions, and ways to
understand conscience as part of the common good rather than a field
of adversarial politics.
Scholars:
Helen
Alvaré (Chair),
George Mason University
Robert P.
George,
Princeton University
Douglas L. Carver
Yuval Levin,
Ethics and Public Policy Center
V. Bradley Lewis,
Catholic University of America
Michael Moreland,
Villanova University
O. Carter Snead,
University of Notre Dame